Crossover
CSI/Without a Trace
- “Wow. Brass has lost a lot of weight. Did I imagine him being fatter, or is he much thinner than he used to be?”
- Gil should try punching people in the face now and then.
- LOL. Gil’s office as an overflow room. Is it this way on purpose?
- This episode is kinda starting to seem like an ad for Without a Trace.
- Hey, look, there’s a random patrol cop! They’d never kill him off, so I’m wondering how he is going to get out of this… RANDOM PATROL COP, NOOOOOOO! I totally didn’t see that coming.
- We get it. That Without a Trace guy is very emotional and all about parents of missing children. I assume he lost his own child before he was in the cold case division of the FBI?
- “A hooker? In New York, we just call them hos.” I could like that guy.
- We kinda lost interest after it switched to Without a Trace. We don’t know the characters. Eh.
November 10th, 2007 at 2:35 am
this was sooo dumb. csi franchise crossovers are one thing, but without a trace? come on. if they were really intent on some random cross-promotion, they should at least have gone with CSI and 60 Minutes, maybe something about a dead hooker turning up in Andy Rooney’s office.
November 10th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
i’m not sure if I will watch this one. what’s the point when I can’t watch Without a Trace? D-U-M!
November 10th, 2007 at 4:45 pm
They need to put Without a Trace back on Sunday night so we can easily avoid it. I usually watch L&O:CI on USA but I suffered through this because, like Grissom, “I hate leaving a puzzle half solved.”
November 13th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
Meh. I used to watch WOAT, but gave up because it was so, meh. I did like that hos line though.
November 20th, 2007 at 11:25 pm
CSI was an ad for WOAT, mostly for the main character. I watched WOAT, and it was an ad for Grissom. But it sorta worked.